Welcome to our blog, where the legal world isn’t just serious—it’s a full-on adventure! From courtroom drama to the unsung heroes behind the scenes (yes, that’s us court reporters!), we’re here to show you just how fast-paced and inspiring the legal field can be. Whether you’re an attorney making big moves or a legal pro managing the details, we’ve got stories, tips, and a dash of humor to keep things fresh. Dive in—because life in the legal world is way more thrilling than TV!
Posted: July 30th, 2025
The Secret Weapon Every Law Firm Needs
Behind every successful law firm isn’t just sharp legal minds, it’s a solid support system making sure everything runs like clockwork. That’s where Attorney Support Services come in.
If you’re new to the legal world, or even if you’ve been practicing for years, you might not realize how critical these behind-the-scenes services are. At KW Court Reporting, we’ve expanded our offerings to become your full-service legal support partner. That means we now handle everything from court filings and process serving to document retrieval and rush messenger deliveries so you don’t have to.
Let’s break it down
What Are Attorney Support Services?
Attorney Support Services are the essential legal logistics that help law firms function efficiently. These services keep your cases moving forward while freeing you and your team to focus on strategy, court appearances, and client advocacy.
Here’s what’s typically included:
In short: attorney support services are everything that makes sure your documents get where they need to go, are filed on time, and that people get served – legally and correctly.
If you’re a new attorney, understanding these services is crucial. You may know the law inside and out, but if a complaint doesn’t get filed properly or a party isn’t served correctly, your case can be delayed or even dismissed. That’s why these services aren’t just “nice to have,” they’re essential.
If you’re a seasoned litigator, you already know how frustrating it is to deal with vendors who drop the ball, miss deadlines, or require constant follow-up. That’s why consolidating your services with a single, reliable partner is a game-changer.
At KW, we take that burden off your plate.
Whether you’re filing a civil complaint, recording a lien, retrieving a court order, or serving a subpoena, you’re using attorney support services, whether you call them that or not.
Most firms juggle multiple vendors to get it done. One handles filings, another takes care of process serving, and a third might deliver documents across town. It gets confusing. It gets expensive. It gets inefficient.
KW Court Reporting now handles it all, with a single point of contact, one easy-to-use portal, and a responsive team that makes sure nothing slips through the cracks.
Every day, our clients use these services to support motions, deadlines, hearings, and filings, and most importantly, to support their peace of mind.
What makes KW Court Reporting unique is that we’re not just a court reporting firm anymore. We’re your all-in-one legal support solution. That means:
We’ve built a system that works for attorneys, not the other way around.
Working with multiple service providers leads to dropped handoffs, billing confusion, and missed deadlines. At KW, everything is streamlined. You’ll get:
We’re also court reporter-owned, so we know how critical timelines are, and we never treat your cases like just another order number.
Whether you’re just starting your practice or managing litigation for a major firm, we scale to meet your needs. Solo attorneys love how we make their lives easier. Big firms appreciate how we simplify operations across multiple teams.
Our clients span family law, personal injury, civil litigation, employment law, and everything in between. No matter your specialty, attorney support services are part of your workflow. And now, we make them friction-free.
If you’re still juggling separate vendors for court reporting, filing, process serving, and deliveries, there’s a better way.
So you can focus on winning cases, not chasing down logistics.
Visit our Attorney Support Services page to learn more. You can register and create your account in minutes. Once you’re in, you’ll have access to your own attorney dashboard where you can easily manage, schedule, and track all your services.
Prefer a little help getting started? Give us a call! Our team is happy to walk you through the setup. It’s quick, simple, and you’ll be up and running in no time.
Your full-service legal support partner—from depo to delivery.
Posted: July 29th, 2025
If you’ve ever found yourself buried in a mountain of deposition transcripts, trying to track down one critical statement or prep your expert for trial, this blog is for you.
At KW Court Reporting, we know just how time-consuming and mentally draining depo review can be. That’s why we’re thrilled to offer EchoBrief, our new AI-powered deposition summary tool designed to save you hours (and honestly, your sanity).
Let’s break it all down, what EchoBrief does, how it works, and why so many attorneys are loving it.
Think of it as your depo’s greatest hits, pulled together in a matter of minutes.
An AI deposition summary uses natural language processing to read and analyze the full transcript, then instantly generates an accurate, concise summary of the most important testimony. With EchoBrief, you’ll get both a narrative-style overview and a page-line summary, so you can digest the key info fast, without reading every single word.
Yes, it’s as amazing as it sounds.
Here’s how EchoBrief is helping legal teams everywhere work smarter:
A typical 200-page depo could take your team 8–15 hours to summarize manually. With EchoBrief, you’ll have a clean, structured summary in under 10 minutes.
EchoBrief highlights the most critical points and organizes them by issue or topic. Whether you’re prepping a witness or drafting a motion, you’ll spend less time searching and more time strategizing.
Use summaries to identify what’s already been covered, where things got tricky, and how to fine-tune your approach for the next depo. It’s especially helpful when prepping expert witnesses or co-counsel.
Need to find that perfect quote from a witness? Done. EchoBrief makes it easy to pull impactful testimony for briefs, exhibits, outlines, and trial scripts.
We’ve packed EchoBrief with tools to make your life easier:
• Narrative Summaries – Easy-to-digest overviews written in plain English
• Page-Line Summaries – Precisely cited quotes and testimony
• Custom Topic Breakdowns – Organize by issue, topic, or page range
• Built-In Highlighting – Key admissions and red flags are flagged automatically
• Multiple Export Options – Download your summary in Word, PDF, or plain text
• Searchable Format – Find what you need without endless scrolling
You can even edit summaries right in the platform, track changes, and revert to earlier versions. It’s all designed to be intuitive, flexible, and built for the real-life pace of litigation.
We know how sensitive depo content is. That’s why EchoBrief is built with enterprise-grade security in mind. Your transcripts are protected with the same security protocols used by top legal tech companies. That means:
• No client data is used to train the AI
• Your files are encrypted
• Everything is fully trackable with built-in audit logs
• We’re aligned with strict privacy standards like SOC 2 and HIPAA
You’re in safe hands.
It’s as simple as 1234:
1. Send us your transcript (PDF, Word, or text files all work)
2. We process it through EchoBrief
3. You receive a clean, searchable summary — usually in under 10 minutes
4. Review, prep, and crush your case prep with confidence
Want us to customize it for a particular issue, expert, or section of the depo? Just let us know. We can tailor the summary to whatever you need.
• Trial attorneys prepping for their next depo
• Paralegals juggling massive caseloads
• Legal assistants organizing summaries for partners
• Experts who need to review relevant testimony fast
• Insurance defense and plaintiff firms looking for a smarter workflow
If you touch deposition transcripts in your job, EchoBrief is for you.
We’d love to show you what EchoBrief can do. Ask us to include an AI summary with your next depo, or reach out for a quick demo. We can walk you through it, show you real examples, and help you decide if it’s a good fit for your team.
Reach out here or mention “EchoBrief” in your next depo request, we’ll take it from there.
EchoBrief is fast. It’s secure. It’s ridiculously helpful. And it’s available now at KW Court Reporting.
Stop wasting time reviewing transcripts the hard way.
Let EchoBrief do the heavy lifting.
Posted: July 14th, 2025
Strategy, Accuracy, and the Competitive Edge
In litigation, it isn’t always the loudest argument that wins, it’s the best-documented one. Court reporters may appear to be silent participants in a proceeding, but behind every transcript is a legal ally ensuring that every word, objection, and clarification is captured with complete accuracy. At KW Court Reporting, we know that a clean, airtight record is often the deciding factor between success and missed opportunity in court.
From high-stakes depositions to complex commercial litigation, court reporters provide attorneys with more than transcripts. They offer tools for strategy, support for real-time decision-making, and long-term value that extends far beyond the close of a case.
Today’s court reporters are highly trained professionals who serve as:
• Live evidence managers
• Compliance experts
• Real-time collaborators
• Guardians of legal integrity
With deep knowledge of legal procedure, confidentiality requirements, and emerging litigation technologies, professional court reporters operate as an extension of the legal team. At KW Court Reporting, our reporters are experienced in family law, civil litigation, intellectual property, personal injury, and criminal law. This specialized knowledge ensures the transcript not only documents the case but mirrors its legal nuance.
Depositions are often where a case is won or lost. They offer attorneys a critical opportunity to uncover inconsistencies, lock in testimony, and lay the foundation for a powerful courtroom argument. But that value hinges entirely on the quality and accuracy of the transcript.
Court reporters ensure that every objection is properly noted, every off-the-record discussion is kept out, and procedural elements such as “recess,” “pause in the proceeding,” or “sidebar” are clearly marked. At KW, we enhance these transcripts further with digital formatting, keyword indexing, exhibit tagging, and timestamps. This means attorneys spend less time scrolling and more time strategizing.
In one case, a client used our indexed transcript to quickly locate a contradictory statement made by a witness during deposition. That moment, highlighted and presented in court, helped dismantle the witness’s credibility and shift the jury’s perspective.
Real-time court reporting gives attorneys a competitive edge during fast-moving proceedings. With live text streaming to their screen, attorneys can spot inconsistencies, collaborate instantly with remote colleagues, and even draft objections or motions on the spot.
In a recent complex commercial case, opposing counsel introduced testimony that seemed to diverge from earlier statements. The trial team used the real-time feed to identify the discrepancy in the deposition transcript and address it immediately during cross-examination, a strategic pivot that wouldn’t have been possible without real-time access.
Real-time reporting isn’t just about convenience. It’s about empowering attorneys to act on facts while they’re still being formed.
Appeals hinge on the record. According to the American Bar Association, over 15% of cases are appealed, and appellate judges rely entirely on the transcript to evaluate the case.
If the record is incomplete or unclear, it doesn’t matter how strong the legal arguments are. Court reporters who understand appellate court requirements ensure that transcripts include full speaker identification, properly marked objections and rulings, full index of examinations and exhibits, and are certified and delivered within court deadlines.
One firm we work with credits a successful appeal to having a well-organized, accurately formatted transcript that allowed them to cite exact language in their brief. Precision matters.
With more proceedings happening over Zoom, by phone, or in hybrid formats, maintaining an accurate record has become more challenging than ever. Court reporters are trained to navigate overlapping speech, dropped connections, interpreter pacing, and other issues that can affect proceedings.
While court reporters do not interpret or describe tone or behavior, they follow professional protocol to ensure every spoken word is attributed correctly and any requests for clarification are properly recorded.
In one remote deposition, a technical glitch caused a key phrase to drop out. The reporter immediately paused the proceeding, requested clarification, and captured the corrected testimony on the record. That attention to detail ensured nothing was lost and gave the attorney a reliable record for trial.
Court reporters play a vital role in ensuring compliance. They verify the identity of participants, administer oaths, handle exhibits, and produce certified transcripts that meet jurisdictional requirements. Just as importantly, they remain neutral, protecting the integrity of the record.
At KW Court Reporting, we go further by offering HIPAA-compliant services, encrypted file delivery, and rigorous confidentiality protocols. You can trust that what’s said in the room, or on the screen, is protected and preserved.
Transcripts aren’t just evidence, they’re assets. Firms that archive and review past transcripts gain valuable insights into opposing counsel’s tactics, witness behavior, and case development.
One firm partnered with us to create a searchable digital library of their past depositions and hearings. They now use these transcripts to train new attorneys, identify patterns in expert testimony, and build faster, smarter case strategies.
Whether for preparing cross-examinations or crafting opening statements, past transcripts are one of the most underutilized tools in a law firm’s arsenal.
We’re not just here to type. KW Court Reporting is:
• Certified, experienced, and court-savvy
• Women-owned, minority-owned, and court reporter-owned
• Experts in real-time reporting, remote depositions, and complex case support
• Trusted by top law firms for professionalism, reliability, and accuracy
Our clients count on us not just to show up, but to show up ready to support their strategy and help them win.
In today’s high-stakes legal environment, facts alone aren’t enough. You need the power to prove those facts, reference them in real time, and support them in every phase of litigation.
A high-quality transcript is more than a record. It’s a strategic tool.
If you’re preparing for a deposition, trial, arbitration, or appeal, don’t settle for the basics. Partner with a court reporting team that understands how to elevate your case.
Contact KW Court Reporting today to schedule your next proceeding and experience how precision, professionalism, and legal insight can help you win.
Posted: July 4th, 2025
AB 931 Passes Senate Judiciary Committee: What California’s New Litigation
Funding Bill Means for Attorneys and Court Reporting Vendors
AB 931, a key consumer protection bill backed by the Consumer Attorneys of California (CAOC), is making waves in the legal industry, and for good reason. The bill, which addresses transparency and ethics in litigation funding, recently passed the California Senate Judiciary Committee with a decisive 11-2 vote.
Casey Johnson, CAOC’s 2nd Vice President, testified in Sacramento in strong support of the legislation, helping to ensure its successful advancement through the committee.
But while AB 931 is designed to rein in predatory litigation finance practices, it also carries important implications for attorneys working with third-party legal vendors, especially court reporting firms that offer deferred or non-recourse payment models.
In plain English: AB 931 regulates companies that give money to plaintiffs before their lawsuits settle, a practice known as litigation funding.
These funding companies often:
• Charge very high fees
• Use complex contracts that are hard to understand
• Offer kickbacks or referral bonuses to lawyers in exchange for client referrals
AB 931 changes that by requiring:
• Contracts to be clear, written in plain language, and fully transparent
• A five-day cancellation window for clients
• No hidden fees, compounding interest, or abusive repayment terms
• No kickbacks or referral incentives to or from attorneys
• Strong penalties (up to $10,000 per violation, plus cancellation rights and legal fees)
It also reinforces Rule 5.4 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits fee-sharing between lawyers and non-lawyers, a rule designed to protect legal ethics and prevent conflicts of interest.
Although AB 931 is focused on litigation finance, its ripple effects could extend into the world of court reporting, especially with firms that operate under deferred payment or nonrecourse models, where the law firm doesn’t pay for services until the case settles, and possibly not at all if the case is lost.
These financial structures can resemble litigation funding, which could raise ethical red flags, especially if:
• The court reporting company is not owned or operated by certified court reporters
• The vendor is structured as an Alternative Business Structure (ABS), commonly found out of state
• Any part of the arrangement could be seen as fee-sharing or outcome-dependent
Under AB 931 and Rule 5.4, California law firms must steer clear of any vendor arrangement that could be interpreted as an unauthorized fee split or an unethical referral.
At KW Court Reporting, we applaud the passage of AB 931 and the efforts of CAOC in protecting California consumers and preserving legal integrity.
We want to assure our clients that:
• We do not participate in kickbacks, referral bonuses, or outcome-based billing
• We are 100% court reporter-owned and California-based – not an ABS or outside entity
• We follow all California ethics rules, including Rule 5.4
• Our billing is straightforward, transparent, and never tied to case results
By choosing KW Court Reporting, you’re partnering with a vendor who puts your ethics, your clients, and your professional reputation first.
If you’re currently working with any court reporting firm that:
• Offers “no win, no pay” or nonrecourse payment structures
• Operates under non-lawyer ownership or out-of-state control
• Requests or offers referral incentives or “preferred rates” for client volume
…it may be time to reassess. These arrangements could violate AB 931 and expose your firm to disciplinary action under Rule 5.4.
We are California-owned and operated, and fully compliant with AB 931, Rule 5.4, and CCR § 2475. Our billing is clear, fair, and never tied to litigation outcomes.
When you work with KW, you’re working with a vendor that puts your clients—and the integrity of the judicial process—first.
If you’re unsure whether a vendor’s billing model or ownership structure puts your firm at risk, KW Court Reporting is here to help. We’ll walk you through any concerns, explain the ethical boundaries, and ensure your litigation support team remains fully compliant and trustworthy.
Contact KW Court Reporting to learn more about how we protect your practice – and your clients – every step of the way.
Posted: May 26th, 2025
Growth, Innovation & Endless Opportunity
If you’ve been wondering where the court reporting industry is headed, the answer is clear: upward and forward. The future of court reporting is a powerful blend of human expertise and technological innovation, offering growth, flexibility, and exciting new tools that are transforming how we work.
At KW Court Reporting, we’re not just watching these changes unfold—we’re helping shape them.
As we head deeper into 2025, several court reporting trends are taking center stage. We’re seeing everything from hybrid court reporting models that blend in-person and virtual services, to the rise of remote court reporter jobs that offer greater flexibility and work-life balance without compromising accuracy or professionalism.
The legal industry is embracing cloud transcription platforms and secure transcript storage, streamlining access and delivery while ensuring confidentiality. These tools are empowering us—not replacing us—and allowing court reporters to deliver even more value in real time.
And with virtual court hearings becoming more common across the country, court reporters are stepping into the future with confidence, armed with tech-savvy tools and a commitment to precision that’s never been more important.
At the heart of this evolution is technology—and court reporters are leveraging it in big ways. Modern stenographer technology has come a long way. From real-time captioning to software advanced legal transcription software, today’s court reporters are equipped with tools that make our work faster, more accurate, and more accessible. We’re using real-time transcription tools to stream live transcripts during proceedings—allowing attorneys to instantly access testimony, mark key moments, and pivot their strategy on the fly.
We’ve also integrated cloud transcription platforms that simplify transcript delivery, reduce turnaround times, and offer secure transcript storage for easy, on-demand access. These solutions don’t just benefit reporters—they significantly improve the legal workflow for attorneys, paralegals, and legal teams who rely on fast, reliable records.
Tools like speech-to-text for voice reporters and AI-powered editing software help refine transcripts efficiently, while remote-friendly setups allow us to cover proceedings no matter the location. This isn’t just convenience—it’s a competitive edge for legal professionals who need results quickly and securely.
Technology is making court reporting more responsive, more dynamic, and more aligned with the fast pace of today’s legal world—and everyone benefits.
Let’s talk more about AI in court reporting. There’s no denying that speech-to-text, legal transcription software, and real-time transcription tools are evolving rapidly. But let’s be clear—AI can’t replace the judgment, integrity, or contextual awareness of a professional court reporter.
What AI can do is help us work smarter. From AI-powered formatting and error-checking to, faster transcript turnaround, this technology acts as a sidekick—making our work more efficient without ever compromising quality. It’s not about replacing humans; it’s about enhancing the human touch.
This harmonious blend of human expertise and technological innovation is the future—and
court reporters who embrace it are only going to get better and better.
As the legal system gets busier and more complex, the demand for skilled court reporters is growing fast. In fact, with a court reporter shortage looming nationwide, there’s never been a better time to enter or grow within this industry.
The Future of Court Reporting career outlook is full of promise—flexible schedules, competitive pay, and the opportunity to work at the cutting edge of justice. Plus, with more firms and courts adopting advanced stenographer technology, reporters are staying ahead of the curve through continuing education for court reporters and constant skill-building.
Whether you’re using a traditional stenotype machine or the latest digital tools, the future of court reporting is yours to shape.
While technology is changing how we work, it isn’t changing why we’re needed. Court reporters bring accountability, professionalism, and accuracy to every proceeding. We capture nuance that software can’t recognize, uphold confidentiality that AI can’t promise, and ensure the integrity of the record in ways no automation can match.
As proceedings become faster and more complex, the human element remains essential. At KW Court Reporting, we believe that no matter how far technology goes, it will always take skilled professionals to ensure the legal system runs smoothly—and justly.
Whether we’re adopting the latest legal transcription software, offering hybrid court reporting solutions, or ensuring secure transcript storage for every client, KW Court Reporting is staying ahead of the curve —without losing sight of what matters most: people.
Our experienced team thrives at the intersection of precision and progress. From virtual court hearings to real-time transcription tools, we bring modern solutions with an unwavering commitment to excellence.
Ready to partner with a team that combines experience, adaptability, and forward-thinking innovation? KW Court Reporting is here for your depositions, hearings, and trials—anytime, anywhere.
Let’s write the future—together.
Posted: May 2nd, 2025
Why Digital Recordings Can’t Replace Certified Court Reporters. Technology has changed nearly every industry—law included. Courtrooms are more connected than ever. From virtual hearings to e-filing, the legal profession is rapidly evolving. However, one question keeps coming up: Can digital recordings replace certified court reporters?
It’s a fair question. Digital recording systems seem cost-effective and easy to install. They promise hands-free, automated capture of legal proceedings. But when accuracy, nuance, and legal standards are on the line, the reality tells a different story.
This article explores why digital recordings can’t replace certified court reporters—not just in theory, but in practice, ethics, and results.
When testimony begins, there’s no rewind button. A certified court reporter transcribes words as they happen, with precision. They don’t just type—they listen with trained ears, catching context, tone, and legal terminology that voice-recognition tools simply don’t grasp.
Digital recordings don’t provide real-time access. Attorneys can’t refer back to statements mid-proceeding. There’s a lag between the recording and the final transcript. And if something crucial is said unclearly, a machine won’t stop and ask for clarification. A court reporter will.
When it comes to preserving the official record, judgment matters. And judgment is uniquely human.
Why Digital Recordings Can’t Replace Certified Court Reporters in Complex Legal Settings
Speech-to-text software has improved, but even the best tools stumble over industry-specific language, thick accents, and multiple speakers. Add in legal jargon, and the error rate climbs fast. In litigation or arbitration, one word can change the meaning of an entire exchange. That margin of error is unacceptable.
Certified court reporters are trained specifically for legal contexts. They know how to spell unusual surnames, cite statutes, and transcribe technical terms correctly the first time.
In legal proceedings, the integrity of the transcript is critical. Certified court reporters provide a verifiable, secure record that holds up in court. Their work can be traced, verified, and certified under oath.
Digital recordings can be duplicated, edited, or lost. If a file goes missing or is compromised, there’s no guaranteed fallback. The legal system needs certainty, not “close enough.”
Batteries die. Microphones fail. Files get corrupted. Even in modern courtrooms, tech doesn’t always cooperate. Once a recording is lost, there’s no recovering it. You can’t re-run a deposition or a live witness statement. What’s said is said—and if it’s not recorded correctly, it’s gone.
Court reporters use backup equipment, monitor audio levels in real time, and ensure redundancy. They’re trained to catch issues immediately and correct them on the fly—something no recording device can do alone.
With digital recording, you still need someone to transcribe the audio afterward. That takes time. It introduces more room for human error—especially if the person transcribing wasn’t present and doesn’t know who’s speaking or the legal context.
A court reporter finishes their transcript accurately and efficiently, often within hours. That speed matters when preparing for tomorrow’s trial or a high-stakes motion.
Certified court reporters are bound by professional ethics and confidentiality agreements. They’re trained to handle sensitive information discreetly and securely. They don’t upload data to public servers or use unsecured apps.
Digital recordings, by contrast, are more vulnerable. Files can be hacked, leaked, or misrouted. Once sensitive testimony or medical records are in the cloud without safeguards, you can’t undo that exposure.
Certified court reporters are a stabilizing presence in depositions and hearings. They bring professionalism, order, and neutrality. They help ensure that speakers don’t talk over each other, that everyone is clearly heard, and that the environment remains respectful and productive.
Posted: March 26th, 2025
The Magic Behind the Keys: What exactly is a Court Reporter? If you’ve ever been in a courtroom or a deposition, you’ve probably noticed someone sitting quietly with a strange looking little keyboard, typing away like their life depends on it. That’s the court reporter—the person responsible for capturing every single word spoken, no matter how fast or complex the conversation gets. But what exactly are they doing on that odd machine, and why is it so important? Let’s pull back the curtain on this fascinating profession and explore what makes court reporting such a vital and impressive part of the legal system.
Written By:
At first glance, a stenotype machine might resemble a typewriter designed by aliens. It has only 22 keys, far fewer than your standard QWERTY keyboard. Yet, this compact device allows court reporters to capture the spoken word with incredible speed and accuracy. How?
Unlike a regular keyboard where each key represents a letter, the steno machine operates on phonetics—how words sound rather than how they’re spelled. This means court reporters can capture entire syllables or even words with a single stroke. For example:
Each stroke represents a combination of sounds, pieced together using steno theory, a system of rules that allows for speed and consistency.
The steno keyboard is divided into sections:
For instance, to write the word “cat”:
All this happens simultaneously—yes, simultaneously! It’s like playing a piano, but instead of producing music, court reporters create a written record of spoken language.
Learning steno theory is like learning a new language. Court reporters train for years to master this system, memorizing thousands of briefs (shortcuts for common words or phrases). For example:
These briefs allow reporters to keep up with rapid speech, ensuring nothing is lost.
Becoming a court reporter is no small feat. It requires dedication, discipline, and years of rigorous training. Most court reporters attend specialized schools or programs that focus exclusively on the skills needed for this demanding profession. Here’s what the journey typically entails:
Training to become a court reporter usually takes 2-5 years, depending on the program and the student’s pace. It’s a blend of classroom education, hands-on practice, and countless hours of drills.
The coursework is comprehensive, covering:
Success as a court reporter hinges on practice. Students spend countless hours memorizing briefs and perfecting their speed and accuracy. Practice sessions often involve transcribing mock trials, depositions, and legal scenarios. To build speed, students progressively increase their typing rates, aiming to surpass the 225-word-per-minute benchmark.
Many programs include internships or externships, giving students the opportunity to shadow experienced court reporters and gain exposure to real-world settings. This hands-on experience is invaluable for building confidence and skill.
Most people speak at 150-200 words per minute. Attorneys in full swing? Easily 250 words per minute or more. To keep up, court reporters must type at speeds exceeding 225 words per minute with 98% accuracy—a standard set by certification exams.
The court reporter’s brain is a marvel of multitasking and linguistic gymnastics. When people speak, their words go through an astonishing mental process in the reporter’s mind:
This process happens at lightning speed, often compared to playing a high-speed game of chess while running a marathon. A doctor once described this as a court reporter’s ability to split their brain into multiple tasks: listening, processing, writing, and anticipating—all while maintaining focus amid courtroom distractions.
Why go to such lengths to capture every word? The court reporter’s transcript is the official record of proceedings. It’s a vital document used in appeals, legal arguments, and historical archives. Without it, the judicial system would lack a reliable, unbiased account of what transpired.
Court reporters are more than typists; they are guardians of the spoken word. Their work ensures that every voice is heard and preserved, from the whispered objections to the emphatic closing arguments. They bring precision and professionalism to a role that’s as challenging as it is crucial.
So next time you see a court reporter, remember: beneath their calm exterior lies a whirlwind of mental gymnastics, linguistic expertise, and lightning-fast reflexes. They’re the unsung heroes of the legal world, transforming the chaos of the courtroom into a clear, concise record for generations to come.
Posted: August 1st, 2024
Streamlining your deposition process is crucial for maintaining both efficiency and effectiveness in legal proceedings, as it can significantly impact the overall success of your case by reducing delays, minimizing errors, and ensuring that all necessary information is accurately captured. To assist you in achieving a more streamlined and well-organized deposition process, here are five key steps that you can implement to enhance your workflow and optimize your results:
For instance, if you’re handling a complex case with multiple exhibits, categorize them into folders and label each one clearly. This way, during the deposition, you can quickly reference any document without causing delays.
In a recent deposition, using real-time transcription helped the legal team address inconsistencies in the witness’s testimony on the spot, rather than waiting for the transcript to be processed.
An attorney prepared a detailed outline but remained flexible during the deposition, allowing for follow-up questions that uncovered crucial details about the case.
By briefing the court reporter on technical jargon specific to a medical malpractice case, the legal team ensured that the transcript was accurate and free of misunderstandings.
After reviewing the transcript, the legal team identified a critical inconsistency in the witness’s statements, which led to a follow-up deposition and ultimately strengthened their case.
Streamlining your deposition process involves thorough preparation, effective use of technology, efficient questioning, clear communication, and diligent post-deposition review. By following these steps, you can ensure a more efficient and productive deposition process, ultimately aiding in the success of your case.
Posted: July 24th, 2018
This picture sums up much of our life. Creating a business while growing our families has been one of the most challenging things we have ever done. Five years ago, Whitney and I started our court reporting business from our homes. Whitney had a one-year-old boy, and I was six months pregnant with my son. Luckily, we had a super supportive family. Our husbands encouraged us to go for it, and our parents did whatever they could to help grow our business. Our mom and dad would meet us in parking lots outside law firms, and our mom would bring us chocolate chip cookies she baked the night before to bring to our current and prospective clients. Occasionally, when peering out the window, we could see our kids being chased down a sidewalk or through a lobby, all while the attorneys had no idea it was our family waiting for us. Since then we’ve both had daughters and continually grown our business, each day bringing successes and challenges we could never imagine. Pictured here are our precious babies, a rambunctious group that unknowingly motivated Whitney and me to be great mothers and dedicated business owners. We are proud to be family owned, women owned and a minority-owned business. To all our clients, thank you for making our dreams come true and allowing us to be part of your personal and professional lives. Reporters, we love you all and send respect and profound gratitude for the often thankless hard work.
Posted: January 23rd, 2018
Effective April 1, 2014, transcripts in civil, probate, and mental health proceedings where there was a court reporter can be ordered online. The online request is available from the Court’s public website, www.occourts.org, accessed from the pull-down menu under: QUICK LINKS, How Do I … Request a Transcript?
Santa Ana, CA – Orange County is making it easier for the public to order their transcripts. Effective April 1, 2014, transcripts in civil, probate, and mental health proceedings where there was a court reporter can be ordered online. The online request is available from the Court’s public website, http://www.occourts.org, accessed from the pull-down menu under: QUICK LINKS, How Do I … Request a Transcript?
The Court has created this automated Online Transcript Request Program in an effort to expedite the transcript request process. As many of you have probably experienced, it can take weeks, if not longer, for the court reporter to get back to you regarding your transcript request. That’s because of all the steps you have to go through to get that request into the court reporter’s hands.
Your request will now be sent directly to the court reporter that was present at the proceeding. The reporter will provide you with a cost estimate and make arrangements for payment. The new process is easy to use and requires only that you provide the case number.
Posted: January 23rd, 2018
The closely watched suit challenging five California statutes governing teacher protections came to a conclusion yesterday, as lawyers for the plaintiffs and defendents in Vergara v. California made their closing arguments. (Both LA School Report and The Los Angeles Times have good summaries for you.)
According to Education Week, March 28, 2014 – The closely watched suit challenging five California statutes governing teacher protections came to a conclusion yesterday, as lawyers for the plaintiffs and defendents in Vergara v. California made their closing arguments. (Both LA School Report and The Los Angeles Times have good summaries for you.)
The lawsuit, bankrolled by a Silicon Valley entreprenuer and argued by some of the same lawyers who argued the Proposition 8 gay-marriage case before the U.S. Supreme Court, seeks to overturn rules governing teacher dismissal, tenuring, and layoffs in the Golden State.
The course of the two-month trial, heard by Judge Rolf N. Treu without a jury in Los Angeles Superior Court, hinges on very different readings of the laws in question: Is 18 months too short of a time to decide whether to grant teachers tenure, or is it sufficient and indeed in the best interest of students? Are seniority rules blind to real differences in teacher quality, or is it the only fair and objective way to govern layoffs? Are low dismissal rates of poorly performing teachers the result of the state’s “byzantine” procedures, or the failure of administrators to adhere to them?
At the heart of many of those questions is the still-thorny issue of how to identify the best teachers. That’s been a national theme, with some 35 states crafting new evaluation systems to help identify and remediate their teachers.
Underscoring the lack of consensus on the topic, though, attorneys for the plaintiffs called several youths who painted unflattering portraits of their teachers, as well as researchers who testified to earnings and educational benefits of those students taught by teachers with high “value added” scores.
Lawyers representing the state of California and the two state teachers’ unions noted the district awards some of those teachers had received—and said that “value added” methods were flawed and unreliable. Both sides also called a number of well known education researchers, exposing rifts among academics on those same topics.
The parties will have until April 10 to submit final briefs in the case. Judge Treu then will have 90 days to issue a ruling. Whatever it is, the opposing side is almost certain to appeal.
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2014/03/fate_of_california_teacher_protections.html
Posted: January 20th, 2018
In a temporary settlement of a dispute that led employees to picket in front of the county courthouse last year, about 100 court reporters will get $2,300 each to help cover a huge jump in their health care costs.
But the payments aren’t a permanent fix, and talks will restart in September between the reporters’ union and court officials. Court reporters transcribe every hearing and trial.
The dispute started in 2012, when the court cut the reporters from 40 hours a week to 35 and deemed them part-time employees. That meant a 12.5 percent pay cut and a spike in health care premiums that took effect last year. One veteran reporter, Debi Pinkham, said her monthly payments went from $400 to $1,200.
The increase was so dramatic because the court pays 75 percent of health care premiums for full-time employees, but only half as much – 37.5 percent – for part-time workers.
In December, the court and the union representing reporters agreed to split a one-time health-insurance subsidy for reporters of $2,316 a person.
That will cost the court and the union, the Orange County Employees Association, about $115,000 apiece.
Jennifer Muir, assistant general manager for the union, said union officials and reporters hope the state restores some court funding between now and September when contract talks restart.
Orange County Superior Court officials declined to comment beyond the signed agreement, spokeswoman Gwen Vieau said.
State funding for Orange County courts in the most recent year was $13 million less than it had been two years prior. The court used $19 million in reserve funds to cover a revenue shortage in its 2013-14 budget.
But next year’s revenue is expected to fall $40 million short of planned expenses, and court officials have said state rules will prevent them from using reserve money to cover that gap.
During their lunch breaks in November, court reporters stood outside the Central Justice Center in Santa Ana holding banners and signs with messages including “Restore my full-time benefits” and “Superior Court of Wal-Mart.”
As they stood with protest signs, reporters said they understood the need for shared sacrifice at a time of budget cuts. They wouldn’t have complained if everyone took furlough days or had to share a similar increase in health care costs. But they said they were singled out, perhaps because of a perception they made too much money.
An experienced reporter could earn $78,000 to $93,000 a year before the cuts, one said. Reporters said they’ve earned those salaries through state qualifications and years of experience.
At the time, Muir compared the court’s move to corporations making workers part time to get out of paying benefits.
She contrasted the treatment of the reporters with that of the judges who are ultimately their bosses. Judges, who make more than $178,000, pay nothing toward their own health care.
Meanwhile, reporters said the changes forced them to cancel vacations or take out loans to send kids to college. One reporter said her take-home pay went down $21,000 a year.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/court-605970-reporters-time.html
© 2024 kwcourtreporting.com All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site By: struc1.com
